Every AI tool your company adopts is a security decision.
Trackr helps security leaders evaluate AI and SaaS tools for security posture, data handling transparency, and vendor risk — with independent research in 2 minutes and a structured 7-dimension framework.
Free to start. Enterprise plans for security governance.
The problem
Why tool decisions break down
AI tool procurement moves faster than security review
Teams adopt AI tools on credit cards before security has a chance to evaluate them. By the time security is involved, the tool is embedded in workflows and user data has already been processed through an unreviewed vendor's systems.
Security evaluation of AI tools requires specialized knowledge
AI tools introduce distinct risk vectors — training on customer data, unclear retention policies, third-party AI model dependencies, and regulatory uncertainty. Evaluating these requires more than a standard vendor questionnaire.
No consistent framework for AI tool risk assessment
Security teams evaluate tools inconsistently — different criteria for different tools, driven by whoever has bandwidth. Without a standardized framework, risk comparisons across tools are impossible and audit documentation is weak.
How Trackr helps
What Trackr does for your team
Security dimension in every research report
Every Trackr report includes a security and compliance dimension — covering data handling transparency, SOC 2 status, enterprise security features, and known privacy concerns surfaced from community and compliance sources.
Independent vendor analysis before procurement commits
Trackr gives security leaders an independent research baseline on any tool — before the vendor sales process begins. Use the report to structure vendor security questionnaires and due diligence around the actual risk vectors for each tool.
Centralized AI tool inventory for security governance
Track every AI tool deployed across the organization with a persistent record of when each was evaluated, what the security assessment showed, and what the current compliance posture is. Use this for audit documentation and board reporting.
“We now require a Trackr report before any AI tool can be expensed. It gives our team a consistent baseline and flags the data handling questions we need answered before procurement commits.”
— CISO, 800-person enterprise software company
Get started
Every AI tool your company adopts is a security decision.
Trackr helps security leaders evaluate AI and SaaS tools for security posture, data handling transparency, and vendor risk — with independent research in 2 minutes and a structured 7-dimension framework.
Free to start. Enterprise plans for security governance.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Trackr assess a tool's security posture specifically?
Trackr's 7-dimension framework includes a security and compliance dimension that covers data handling policies, SOC 2 / ISO 27001 certification status, enterprise security features, and community-reported concerns. It's an initial assessment tool — not a replacement for a formal security audit or vendor questionnaire.
Can Trackr help with AI tool governance policy?
Trackr provides the inventory and evaluation framework that underpins a governance policy. Security leaders use Trackr to build the approved tool list, document evaluation criteria, and track the AI stack for policy enforcement.
How does Trackr handle AI tools with opaque data practices?
When a tool's data handling practices are unclear or poorly documented, Trackr flags this in the report with appropriate context. Opacity in AI tool data practices is itself a risk signal — Trackr identifies it as part of the security dimension.
Can I share Trackr reports with my security team?
Yes. Reports are shareable within your workspace and can be exported as PDF for distribution to security teams, procurement, and legal. Enterprise plans support team workspaces with role-based access.
How Trackr compares
All comparisons →Also built for
See all teams →